To Eleven Marketing

July 2, 2010

Promotional Planning, what it can and can’t do

Filed under: General — admin @ 9:37 am

Promotion is a powerful short-term marketing tool. Developing a promotional plan requires strategic thinking and creativity. In many instances, marketers begin at the execution stage and randomly consider idea after idea without any thought as to the ends they are trying to achieve. The results can be costly, with a lot of time and effort being spent on developing promotion ideas that are inappropriate to your current market situation and competitive situation. The key is to establish promotion objectives and strategies first and then develop innovative, yet targeted, solutions

The purpose of promotion is to provide added incentive, encouraging the target market to perform some incremental behavior. The incremental behavior results in either increased short-term sales and/or an association with your business or its products. Promotions should be developed from the aspect that achieving the promotion’s objectives are not the end result, but instead are the means to implement marketing strategies to help achieve marketing objectives. What this means is that promotions can serve as a tool that is necessary to achieve your long-term goals.

The most basic method of incorporating promotion into your long-term plan is by using a trial-to-loyalty method of promotions. This is a method where the marketer takes the consumer through successive steps from trial to repeat purchase by using a disciplined long-term promotion plan. With each step the consumer is given less reinforcement or incentive to make a purchase, until finally the consumer makes purchases at full price and becomes a loyal, long-term customer. The primary incentive should be given to new customers with the secondary incentives given to repeat customers—the reason being that it takes a greater incentive to attract a new customer to make the initial purchase. Once the customer has tried the product and experienced the other non-tangible attributes of your business (i.e. level of customer service) each successive purchase should be due to these factors instead of due to a promotion. What you want to be doing during promotions is educating customers as to the quality of products and services you have to offer, and why they should purchase from you as opposed to your competition. It would follow then that preparing your business for any type of promotion is more important than the promotion itself in the long run.

Finally there are a few reminders of what not to do in your promotional planning. Don’t expect promotions to solve long-term sales declines or create customer loyalty, people will make the initial purchase for the sake of the promotion alone. Don’t overuse or develop a dependence on promotions. This could cause an erosion of your image and the value of the products you sell. Don’t run promotions because you did last year, think strategically and look ahead not behind. A promotion should not replace other tools of marketing, use promotion for its inherent strengths; don’t give deals unless you can be sure it is building your business.

April 19, 2010

Twitter is dessert, not the main course

Filed under: General — admin @ 10:27 am

I was talking to a local retailer recently about the popularity of social media marketing and what the fuss was all about.  She mentioned some success stories she had read about from businesses promoting themselves on twitter, and having great success, and talking to other small retailers who say they are cutting back on advertising and putting more of their efforts on places like facebook and twitter. My first thought is I feel sad.  It has been an unfortunate site over the years when you see these local retailers go out of business, and this type of marketing strategy will only get them there quicker.  I get what the attraction is – everybody is talking about social media marketing as the next great place to be, and….it is free.  Free and popular, what else would you ask for?  What these small businesses don’t understand though, is that the companies that are really successful in the social media circle are not using it as a replacement for the bread and butter marketing practices that got them where they are today, social media marketing is IN ADDITION TO your regular marketing.  The really good success stories you hear from national businesses was made possible because of the other marketing they have done.  First of all, if a small business signs up on twitter or facebook, they need to get followers (beyond family and friends they tell to sign up), and we mean volume of followers.  Just like any other marketing vehicle, this is a numbers game.  1% response would be great if you can get it – and you would be more likely to get 0.1% than 1%, which means you need 1000 followers to get 1 response.  The reason social media works better for the nation chains is they are able to build a large enough audience to get response.  The first thing they have that you don’t, is a national recognizable brand.  While twitter may be free,  a nationally recognized brand cost millions plus.  They also have resources to pour into social media – a team of college grads that sit in the office and post tweets and update facebook pages by the hour, again, now you are not so free anymore.

The bottom line though is that what makes social media work for other businesses are strong marketing practices behind it.  So the worst thing you could ever do, is use social media to replace your advertising, direct mail, etc, or god forbid, take down your website and replace it with a facebook page.  The purpose of facebook for businesses should be to drive more traffic to your website.  So when asked what I think of all the social media hype, my response is something like ” it is sadly inappropriate to offer a starving child dessert when he has had no dinner”

That is what social media is, the dessert, it is fun and it tastes good, but if you live on it alone, you will not be healthy – and not likely have a healthy bottom line.  So do you use it?  of course, it is free, but keep it its place – it is an extra marketing activity you use to supplement your traditional marketing practices, at least until you get more followers than Ashton Kutcher, then we’ll talk.

March 3, 2010

The Ipad will not kill print

Filed under: General — Tags: , , , — admin @ 4:10 pm

I just finished reading an article in Fortune magazine, discussing whether the Ipad and other tablets will kill newspapers and magazines or be their savior.  The article focuses more on the newspaper industry than magazines, I think because newspapers are dying faster and seem to be floundering and lost more than their counterparts in the glossy world.  There is also discussion and comment throughout as to the future of print as a whole – books magazines, etc.  Now I am as big an Apple fan as the next guy, and I am excited to get an Ipad, once it has the built in internet access beyond WIFI hotspots, but I also am an avid reader who doesn’t see print disappearing.  While I love technology and the apps and all it cal do to make life easier, there are time I want to read something in print, you know, ink on paper.  Especially when it is long.  There are comments about how newspaper and magazine articles are too long, and not transferable to a web world (that’s why it is called a web BROWSER).  I agree. When I find a longer article online I print it to read on paper.  In general it is easier for people to read black txt on white paper than it is an electronic screen.  Granted, on the screen you can make the text larger if you are sight challenged, but computer screens are still 72 dpi or 96 dpi, in general is 150 dpi to 300 dpi (dots per inch). This has to do with the resolution, which means print is clearer, sharper, etc.  I also like making notes in articles, when it is for work, or business, and ink on paper is an easier route to go for that kind of thing.

The problem is not the medium, but in how it is delivered, sold, and managed.  There was a pull out from the Publisher of the Washington Post, talking about all the creative strategies they were exploring to transition to the digital world.  The sad part, it’s all crap.  Newspapers say they want to do business online, they say they want to transition, but not really.  They are not willing to jump to the next curve, only extend there limited boundaries along the edges.  I worked in the newspaper industry for almost 14 years, from very small to very large, and what they say and what they mean are two different things.

What they say: “we are exploring creative strategies to transition to the digital world”

What they mean: “we are exploring creative strategies to transition to the digital world, but we are only willing to consider ideas to expand our business on the web that will not significantly affect out traditional print revenues”

Good luck with that.  This is why they will fail, and be replaced by a company that can explore strategies for delivering news and content, but does not have to worry about sacrificing print revenues.  Newspapers are GREEDY.  They only want more revenue from digital to add to their declining print revenue. If they could think outside the tiny little box they live in, they might see that a new model of predominantly digital with print might generate more revenue than their strategy of grasping tightly to every print dollar they earn while 15 years later they still wonder how to really make money on the web. So newspapers will continue their sad decline, until they are replaced, yet, I think in this new regime there will be a place for print.  It might be sorted and collected digitally, written, laid out, presented digitally, delivered digitally, and then received by people like me, who will print out the articles I wish to read, and one night a week or so I soak in a hot bath with an ice cold beer, the only room in the house where I am not interrupted, and enjoy reading print in peace and quiet.

February 15, 2010

Using Text Link Ads to improve SEO

Filed under: General — admin @ 10:43 am

Text Link advertising is a form of web site advertising with some popularity these last few years. Generally this involves “hard-coding” text link ads on high traffic, here in the hopes that this will improve your own search engine ranking, which will then result in more visitors to your web site. As the popularity of this form of advertising grew, businesses launched services to manage this for you, by setting up partnerships with many high traffic sites, then they sell you text links on their “network” of sites and they keep a percentage of the monthly fee.

This advertising stems from the fact that many search engines look at web sites that have a lot of other sites linking to their site as a credible form of evaluating the sites popularity. Of course, that’s not what is happening here. These sites are not linking to you because they think your site has content with value or that it’s popular, but because you are paying them to. Hence, the problem with this form of advertising, you are trying to cheat with your web site, in effect, get a higher ranking on the search engines than your site merits. What merits a good ranking? Content, both in quality and quantity. Your downfall of course is that if you had good content, in quantity and of quality, you likely wouldn’t need to be doing text link ads to begin with.

Purchasing text link ads on high traffic sites in the hopes that it will increase your own ranking is not the best use for your limited advertising dollars. Especially since this form of advertising generates very limited returns. This is how it works: Major search engines such as Google and Yahoo use specific algorithms to rank web sites. Search placement agencies figure out how the majors are ranking sites and then sell their services of improving your web site ranking on the major search engines, such as text link advertising on high traffic web sites. Of course, this is not sanctioned by the search engines themselves, as you are trying to fool them, which makes them less accurate. So what do they do? Change their algorithms, which makes the advertising you are doing completely worthless. So now you have to start over again with something different. And the cycle goes on and on and on. There is also a chance you could actually hurt your ranking, when you overdo it and a search engine notices you are trying to trick them .The search placement agencies don’t care about this because this means you will never leave as a customer, and they continue to make money. Some clues that they are not acting in your best interest and offering services with real “value”? I read on one paid placement web site a line that tries to sell you on their service: “search engine optimization, which every website needs for optimal search engine listings”. When the name of the service is defined by repeating the name of the service but rearranging the order of the words, then my guess is that the provider of that service is having a hard time coming up with any real value. One thing you will notice on all of these text link agencies is that they make no guarantee that your ranking will improve, and they readily admit search engines change their requirements from time to time (and without informing your agency of when or what the new rankings depend on).

So should you never invest in text link ads to try to improve your ranking? I would say do so as a last effort because you have everything else covered and still have advertising dollars left that you can’t find anything else to do with. We’ll assume since you’re doing text links you don’t have good content. The result? When you stop buying text links your results will go away. So unless you can afford to buy text link ads forever the benefit you are buying will not last. How long does it take to see results? At a minimum three to six months, but it could be longer.

Advertising should be an investment, not merely an expense. So instead of this endless cycle that gets you nowhere, take these same resources and invest in content. Content is an investment. It provides return in both the short and long term. It lasts forever. The money you spend on text links that last a month could be used to generate content that stays on your site as long as you own the site. Regardless of how the search engines change their formula, one thing never changes, that is that the sites with the most content or most relevant content get ranked higher than those with less. Search engines that cannot manage this will not stay around, since that is the one element their users demand: relevant search results.

Another reason to invest in content over text links is that it supports the basic marketing philosophy of satisfying customers’ needs. Potential customers visit your web site searching for content. If you invest in search engine ranking without content you disappoint them, and they are that much less likely to return or do business with you.. Even the idea that your products for sale count as content is only semi-plausible. One of the great successes of the Internet is it has made huge amount of information available to the general public, and traffic has grown so dramatically because consumers want this information. To plan to be successful in selling products online without having the corresponding information to go with it will never succeed in the long run, consumers are more informed now than ever. Consumers are demanding more before purchasing. Depth and breadth of content give consumers a reason to come back to your web site more frequently, and this builds brand loyalty, which is an incredible asset for your business.

This should make sense to you. If not, consider the high traffic sites you are buying text link ads on. How many do you think got to be high traffic sites from buying text links on other sites and how many got to be high traffic sites from their content? My guess is that the score is content 100%, text link ads zero.

February 9, 2010

Number Three is the place to be: Search Engine Marketing

Filed under: Websites — admin @ 1:59 pm

Advertising on Google’s Adwords
Search engine Marketing is one area of advertising that is still hot an dcontinues to grow, with more and more businesses adding it to their marketing mix.  Now there are a plethora of firms out there as well who will offer to manage your SEM budget for you, to get the most out of your ad dollars.  However, I see a lot of agencies focusing on getting the top position, paying a premium for their ads and effectively, wasting their clients money.  For those of you still not familiar with Search Engine Marketing,  here is the basic concept: A businesses purchases a keyword(s), where their ad shows up when the keyword is searched on the search engine site (either Google, Yahoo, Bing, or one of the minor networks of other search engines, but we will refer to Google for our example), and also on affiliate sites that run “Google ads” on their own pages. Businesses pay per click, the cost per click is set by bidding, that is, each business sets a maximum amount they will pay for a specific keyword, and the obvious strategy is to bid just a little more than a competitor so your ad will be higher in position. Now since Google originally launched this program they have added other factors, such as your “Quality Score” which can affect your position as well, but for this first example we’ll focus on the main bid vs rank aspect. And there is a problem with this strategy, and it hinges on the pricing model Google has set for its adwords model. If you are new to advertising on Google, you should be cautious about trying to get the number one ad position. When you sign up you will see the top bids for a keyword. It’s easy to bid a few cents more and grab the top spot. However, your competitors have also set a maximum bid that could be much higher than what they are currently paying for the number one position. The result is that as soon as you make the highest bid, Google software ups the competitor’s bid to a penny more, and will keep doing so up to the maximum bid. This works to neither your benefit nor your competitor’s, but to Google’s, who gets the maximum amount for each keyword. Even when you are both at your maximum bid, you can continually raise the maximum in an effort to get the top spot, or top spots, depending on the number of businesses vying for the specific keyword. So what is the end result (besides Google getting rich)?
One business I know started advertising on Google to promote a new ecommerce site for a nice product line. Their top keyword cost approximately $2.00 per click when they started, and there were two existing competitors advertising. In an effort to start the site with a big push they bid enough to get the number one position, and a maximum bid to stay there. Of course the current advertisers were reluctant to give up their spots. Within two months the cost per click rose to $4.50 per click. I imagine Google sitting back and laughing, watching these three businesses go back and forth, doubling the value of a single keyword. The problem, for all three businesses, is the cost per order explodes. Let’s say you can sell one of out ten people who click on your ad, That means in this case the cost per order jumps from $20 to $40. When the average sale was approximately $100, your margins just dropped another 20%, which might make sales go from being profitable to unprofitable.
So what is the solution? Do you cave and settle for a lower ad spot below your competition? Absolutely. It was your ego telling you that the number one spot was preferred to begin with. Think of it this way: when your competitor is above you that means he pays more for every click than you are – that’s a good thing. He might end up getting more clicks, due to his higher position, but not necessarily make more money. Let’s do some math:
Assume over a month you are in third position, you get 400 clicks in 30 days at $2 each, so advertising cost is $800. If 10% of those people actually purchase, and average purchase is $100, your gross revenue is $4,000 (400 x .1 x $100), and gross margin after advertising expense is $3,200 ($4000-$800) – so ROI on your $800 is 400%.
Your competitor in the number one position is paying $4.50 per click, but due to his higher position he gets 600 clicks in the same period. However, there is no reason to believe his conversion percentage (from click to sale) would be any different from yours. Yours could be even higher if your web site is designed better. So what is he getting? Gross revenue is $6000 (600 x .1 x $100) and gross margin is $3,300 ($6,000-$2,700 in adv.) – ROI on $2700 is 122%
So you see in this case he would only be making $100 more, but having to tie up over 3 times the cash to get it.  Here I plugged in numbers just for an example. You must figure the cost of each alternative for each keyword you are considering. You can see for each keyword what the cost per click is for the top 5 spots, and then you can figure which is the most profitable position.

There are a few things to keep in mind here though for long term planning.First is this idea that there are limited customers out there for you on Google.  The logic, some say, to getting the top spot is the need to get more click thrus, as if there are only so many to be had, but that is where people underestimate the sheer audience on Google.  I have worked on some global campaigns with very large budgets, and we still have to cap our campaigns, because we cannot afford to buy all the potential click thrus Google could deliver on a set of keywords – and that is managing a list of 30-50 keywords. There are companies out there who will manage your SEM telling you that you need to manage 1000’s of keywords, when 20 is probably enough, again, because you liekyl cannot buy all the potential clicks from even the top 20 keywords.

The other issue to consider is the lifetime value of a customer. In some cases you would prefer to pay more in advertising to sell a higher number of people through Google even if your margins are less on the current sales. The reason you would do this is the hope that they will return to your site without having to go through Google, and so you will get a second sale without having to pay the same high acquisition cost. Again, do your math. Instead of figuring average revenue from the one sale, figure average revenue from future sales (weighted by the percentage of customers who make repeat purchases).
Ultimately though, you have to assume that the cost per click for all positions will rise as more businesses enter into keyword advertising, and that the rates for the number one and two positions will rise faster. Unless you have customers who make frequent repeat purchases at significant average sale amounts, it is likely that taking a number three or four spot and keeping advertising costs down is the most profitable plan.

Your first step: A Business Review

Filed under: Marketing Strategy — admin @ 1:35 pm

For any business to be successful it is imperative to know where you want your business to be, and to decide that you must first understand where you are.  Whether you are opening a new business or are just interested in improving your present one, the important first step is deciding where you are in the business environment.  By this I mean you should conduct a situation analysis or business review.   The first situation analysis you do will be lengthy and time consuming, but if done properly it will be a useful marketing tool for your business and vital to the decision-making process.  In this instance we are discuss retail stores and their business review.

To begin, go and sit down outside of your store and look in.  It helps to get a different point of view, rather than always from behind the counter.  Write down the strengths and weaknesses of your business.  Be Objective!  Try to avoid the temptation to include generic ideas such as “Great Customer Service” as that is what every business will write down among their strengths, and you want to find the things that you provide that no one else does (ie: what makes your business better than the competition).  Is it your visual set-up, or the selection of products, or is it the prices that make them come in and shop your store? And for what reasons might a customer not shop in your store?

To take this a step further, go to your business on your day off.  Is the location a strength or weakness?  Can customers see your store easily? Is your sign noticeable and inviting?  Notice any traffic difficulties that might irritate a customer ( ie: no available parking, ease of exiting and entering from the street).  When you come to the store front look in and see how business is done while you are not around.  I’ve met many store managers who take the same day of the week off every week because it’s the slowest day of the week.  Unfortunately, what they eventually find out is that it is the slowest day of the week because they are not there.  Although your workers may do a good job in your absence, do they give that extra effort they might give if you were standing right behind them?  And of course you, as a manager, will know the store and its products better than anybody and should be the best salesperson.  Your workers may be doing their best, but is it possible that you might have sold some of the customers that they didn’t.  It happens.  So analyze your training program for your employees and try to develop it so each can become the best salesperson possible.  This leads to another common problem.  Is there someone present who can answer all the customers questions.  Never tell a customer to come back tomorrow and have the manager help them – their question or problem should be taken care of right away.

These are just some of the questions you need to ask yourself to determine what you do best.  But do not focus only on negative aspects, look for positive things as well.  Maybe your staff is your greatest strength, or your location .  Your greatest strength is that which will make a customer buy from you and not a competitor, whether it is your products, prices, free delivery, or the extra hours you stay open at night.  Don’t underestimate the crazy process of how a customer determines where he will shop.  In the next column we’ll cover the next part of your situation analysis which is the competitor analysis.

February 8, 2010

Hello world!

Filed under: General — admin @ 5:19 pm

Welcome to the To Eleven Marketing blog – where we talk about all things Marketing – web design, the latest CMS system, Search Engine Optimization, database marketing, 1 to 1 targeted direct marketing, and on and on.  If you have questions or comments, this is the place to leave them :-)

Powered by WordPress